Serie A clubs recently voted on whether to reduce the number of teams in the Italian top division from 20 to 18. The proposal was put forward by Juventus, Inter Milan, AC Milan, and AS Roma, with the aim of improving the quality of football and reducing the number of games played. However, the majority of clubs voted to keep the number of clubs at 20, citing concerns over the potential impact of this change on the league.
The push for reducing the number of clubs in Serie A was met with criticism from directors of other teams. Urbino Cairo, president of Torino, expressed disapproval of the proposal, describing it as resembling a “super league.” The attitude of the top clubs advocating for the reduction was questioned, with concerns raised about the potential implications for the competitiveness and structure of the league.
Milan president Paolo Scaroni highlighted the issue of player welfare in the debate over the number of teams in Serie A. He pointed out that players often face a heavy schedule due to their involvement in continental tournaments, national team matches, domestic cup competitions, and league fixtures. Scaroni argued that reducing the number of teams could alleviate the burden on players and help prevent injuries caused by an excessive number of matches.
In addition to the debate over the number of teams, Serie A clubs also approved proposals for reforms aimed at increasing the league’s autonomy from the Italian football federation (FIGC). The league is seeking greater decision-making power and autonomy similar to that of the Premier League in England. Serie A president Lorenzo Casini emphasized the need for Serie A to have more influence and control over its own affairs, given its significant economic contribution to Italian football.
Milan’s Scaroni echoed Casini’s sentiments, highlighting the disparity in power within the FIGC and the frustration felt by Serie A clubs. He argued that the current system does not adequately reflect the financial contributions of Serie A clubs to Italian football, calling for a restructuring of the governing body to give the league more autonomy and decision-making authority.
The debate over the number of clubs in Serie A reflects a broader discussion around the league’s structure and governance. While the proposal to reduce the number of teams was ultimately rejected, the call for greater autonomy and influence within the league signals a desire for change and reform in Italian football. The coming months will likely see further discussions and negotiations as Serie A clubs continue to push for a more prominent role in shaping the future of the league.
Leave a Reply